Skip to main content

Irish Green Building Council’s reaction to Budget 2026

Liam Mclaney

The Irish Green Building Council (IGBC) welcomes positive steps on urban regeneration and energy retrofit in Budget 2026,...

Contents

About the author

Marion Jammet

Deputy Chief Executive Officer | Director of Advocacy and Policy | Biodiversity Lead

Marion leads IGBC's policy and advocacy work, developing position papers, engaging on consultations and draft legislation, and representing IGBC on the WorldGBC Europe Policy Task Force and Renovate Europe Committee. With a background in policy, stakeholder engagement and project management, Marion has worked on energy renovation projects across Europe. She previously held roles at Dublin Chamber, Eurochambres and the European Parliament. Marion holds an MA in European Affairs from Sciences-Po and an MSc in Environmental Sustainability from UCD.
The Irish Green Building Council (IGBC) welcomes positive steps on urban regeneration and energy retrofit in Budget 2026, but stresses that critical opportunities to deliver quality, sustainable homes at scale and to reduce our carbon emissions have been missed.
Irish Green Building Council CEO Pat Barry said:   “Budget 2026 contains some positive steps for the built environment, with policies that should help to deliver more homes in urban locations, regenerate town and village centres, and protect the most vulnerable from energy poverty.   However, many of its measures aren’t radical enough to tackle the housing and climate crises. In particular, more must be done to address vacancy and deliver quality, sustainable homes at scale.”

Vacancy & Dereliction

The IGBC welcomes the extension and enhancement of the Living City Initiative and the proposal for a new derelict property tax to be collected by the Revenue Commissioners. These are steps in the right direction, but the proposed measures are likely insufficient to rejuvenate our urban and rural centres. A holistic, integrated approach is needed, including upfront feasibility grants and the establishment of multi-disciplinary vacancy teams in local authorities to fully support the use of “over the shop” premises for residential purposes. Clarity is also needed in Housing for All 2.0 on a timeline to improve planning policies and building regulations to support conversion, adaptive reuse, and intensification of use over demolition and new construction.

Energy Retrofit

The IGBC also welcomes the increase in funding for SEAI and local authorities to retrofit homes but regrets that it does not go far enough to address the underlying issues. More targeted supports are needed to meet our energy retrofit targets and tackle fuel poverty. In particular, many homeowners who don’t qualify for the Warmer Homes Schemes but can’t afford an energy upgrade under existing schemes require specific support. Likewise, additional mechanisms are needed to better support specific cohorts, such as tenants in the private rental sector. Equally, more technical support and guidance are needed. This could be delivered through well-resourced community energy advice hubs located in each local authority.

Compact urban growth

The emphasis on closing the viability gap for higher-density apartments is to be welcomed, but this additional support should be targeted to ensure the apartments are built using low-carbon construction methods, and in sustainable locations, in particular on brownfield sites. Building within the existing urban fabric reduces the carbon emissions associated with transport and new infrastructure, as well as their cost.